The Markin ROI Report for Enterprise Growth TeamsRead now
MARKIN
Field notes
Playbooks8 min read

ARPU vs LTV vs CAC: which number answers which question

ARPU is observed, LTV is forecast, CAC is spend. Using one where another belongs is how a company posts rising LTV while revenue per customer quietly falls.

Romà Llambés
  • #ARPU
  • #Metrics
  • #Playbooks
ARPU vs LTV vs CAC: which number answers which question

Frequently asked

Questions readers ask about this.

What is the difference between ARPU and LTV?
ARPU is the revenue an average active customer generates in a given period, observed directly from billing data. LTV is the total margin a customer is expected to generate over the whole relationship, estimated from churn, margin and discount assumptions. ARPU reports what happened, LTV forecasts what you believe will happen.
Should I optimise for ARPU or LTV?
Operate on ARPU and plan with LTV. ARPU responds to pricing, plan mix, upsell and retention decisions within a quarter and cannot be inflated by changing assumptions. LTV is an investment metric for deciding how much acquisition spend a customer can justify.
Is a 3:1 LTV to CAC ratio a good target?
It is a smell test, not a target. The ratio inherits every assumption inside LTV, so a business can improve it by re-forecasting churn rather than by changing customer behaviour. Read it by channel and recompute it as retention data matures.
Can ARPU rise while the business gets worse?
Yes. If cheap customers churn faster than expensive ones, ARPU rises purely from composition while total revenue falls. Always read ARPU next to cohort ARPU and base composition.

See it in the product

This runs in Markin today.

The same loops this note describes run 24/7 against your customer base. Watch the workspace decide, experiment and execute 1:1.